C. O.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Sir C. Parkinson.
47
reasonably claim that he had no reason to
think that the obligation would not be
Sir G. Tomlinson.
Sir C. Bottomley.
Sir J. Shuckburgh
recognised by the Home Government.
Indeed
the Air Council in the Air Ministry's letter
Permt. U.S. of S.
of 1st October, 1936, to the Treasury
Parly. U.S. of S.
Secretary of State.
expressed the view that it was equitable
that half the cost should be contributed
DRAFT.
#. In their official better bothe Treas. dates ow. The Air Council stated that they considered lice equitable" "the properal that they should contribute half the cost of Enlargement of the site is equitable, having regard to the inadequacy of the exist aerodrome in relation
contemplated,
In They pleselopments arising from The decision to station additional Hirforce muitos à Stk.
from Home funds.
ᄌ.
11.* In the view of the Secretary of
State for the Colonies the particular
question of the contribution towards the
cost of the Kai Tak aerodrome extension is
not one which can be properly made dependent
on a review of the general question of the
provision of land in the Colony for R.A.F.
purposes: and moreover/it is of special
importance to the Colonial Government in
FURTHER ACTION.
cucumstamen view of the present financial difficulty in
Hong Kong that payment of the contribution
should not be delayed. ?
Furthe
in wind of the financial stracts of the Colony, it would clearly be inadvisable to suggest & the Col. foot. that further
band should be placed ab the disposal of the R.A.F. Except on.
definite terms
precise
of repayment
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.